Artemisia Gentileschi

Born: 1593

Died: 1656

Color Theory: Past vs. Present

November 20, 2024

Summary of Artemisia Gentileschi

Artemisia Gentileschi was among the first and only female artists to attain success in the seventeenth century, centuries ahead of her time. Her Baroque paintings were some of the most dramatic and energetic of her generation, and she became recognised for her realism, skillful use of chiaroscuro, and placing women and their tales at the centre of all her works, following in the footsteps of Caravaggio. Her surviving works offer a distinct personal viewpoint on the cultural and societal conventions of the time, norms that she frequently subverted by utilising her position as an artist to remark on society’s male-dominated character and to place an alternate accent on female autonomy.

Although Artemisia Gentileschi’s paintings are aesthetically similar to those of Caravaggio and her father Orazio, her paintings lay a greater focus on reality than those of her forefathers. Her compositions are also more dynamic, and she has fine-tuned her use of texture and colour over her career, becoming recognised for her rich jewel tones and realistic skin tones.

Gentileschi challenged standard portrayals of biblical and mythical female heroes by portraying them as self-motivated heroines capable of making their own choices rather than passive objects of male gaze. She did so by presenting them in a whole new light, allowing them to wield a power that had previously been denied to them by other artists.

The artist’s juvenile sexual assault experience influenced much of her work, and themes of authority abuse, rape, and violence can be found in many of her paintings. Painting these images was most likely a way for her to absorb the anguish of her attack and seek retribution and restitution via her art.

Childhood

Prudentia Montone (who died when Artemisia was 12) and Orazio Gentileschi, a well-known painter, gave birth to Artemisia Gentileschi on July 8, 1593, in Rome. Gentileschi, the eldest of several children, soon shown a flair for art and began to study under her father. Caravaggio, the controversial painter at the vanguard of Rome’s art scene, was a friend of Orazio’s. Orazio and Caravaggio were once accused of painting malicious graffiti on another painter on the streets of Rome.

During the trial, Orazio related a storey about Caravaggio coming to his house to borrow some angel wings, implying that the famous artist knew the Gentileschi family well and that the eldest daughter Artemisia would have met him. Caravaggio was suspected in a murder when Artemisia was 13 and was forced to escape Rome for Naples. Regardless, Caravaggio’s influence can be observed in both Orazio and Artemisia’s art.

Early Life

In 1611, Orazio and another painter, Agostino Tassi, were commissioned to adorn the Palazzo Pallavicini-Rospigliosi in Rome. Orazio engaged Tassi to train Artemisia, who was 17 at the time, in order to help her improve her painting skills. Tassi had one-on-one access to Artemisia as a result of this, and he raped her during one of their tutoring sessions. She subsequently recounted the incident, saying, “He then threw me over the side of the bed, forcing me with his palm on my breast and putting his knee between my legs to keep me from shutting them. He removed my clothing and placed a handkerchief over my mouth to prevent me from shouting “

Artemisia began a relationship with Tassi after the rape, expecting that they would marry, but Tassi subsequently declined to marry her. Orazio made the rare choice to file rape accusations against him, and the ensuing trial lasted seven months. This was based on Artemisia’s status as a virgin before Tassi raped her. Other shocking revelations emerged throughout the trial, including claims that Tassi murdered his wife. Artemisia was tortured with thumbscrews in order to test the truthfulness of her testimony, and she had to endure a gynaecological examination (to confirm her claim that she had been a virgin) as part of the court procedures. This type of suffering might have been disastrous for an artist, yet Artemisia’s fingers were spared lasting harm. Her vehement statement, in which she alleges she murdered Tassi after the rape, reveals much about her character and drive.

Tassi was finally found guilty and banished from Rome as a result. Tassi got protection from the Pope because of his creative ability, thus this punishment was never carried out. Many of Artemisia Gentileschi’s future works, for example, depict images of women being attacked by males or seeking retribution from men in positions of authority.

Orazio arranged for Artemisia to marry Pierantonio Stiattesi, an artist, a month after the trial ended. Stiattesi’s hometown of Florence became their new home. One of her first significant projects was for a fresco at the Casa Buonarotti, Michelangelo’s house, which was being transformed into a monument and museum by his great-nephew.

Mid Life

Artemisia became the first woman to be accepted into the famous Accademia delle Arti del Disegno while living in Florence (the Academy of Arts and Drawing). This gave her the freedom to buy her art supplies without her husband’s approval and to sign her own contracts. She also earned the allegiance of Cosimo II de’Medici, the Grand Duke of Tuscany, from whom she obtained a number of valuable assignments.

Prudentia, Artemisia’s daughter, was born in 1618 and was named after Artemisia’s deceased mother. Around this period, Artemisia began a love romance with Francesco Maria di Niccol Maringhi, a Florentine nobleman. A sequence of letters from Artemisia to Maringhi, found in 2011 by scholar Francesco Solinas, chronicle their romance. Artemisia’s husband, in an unusual move, was aware of the affair and used his wife’s love letters to write with Maringhi himself. Maringhi appears to have played a role in keeping the couple financially afloat, which was a common concern for them owing to Stiattesi’s financial mismanagement.

Due to financial difficulties and extensive allegations of Artemisia’s affair, the couple fell out, and Artemisia left to Rome without her husband in 1621. Here, she was impressed by Caravaggio’s inventions and collaborated with numerous of his disciples, notably the painter Simon Vouet. She was not as successful in Rome as she had planned, and she spent some time in Venice near the end of the decade, probably looking for fresh contracts.

Late Life

Gentileschi went to Naples in 1630, without her husband (but with her daughter), to continue her nomadic existence. She collaborated with a number of well-known painters, including Massimo Stanzione. Artemisia was invited to Charles I of England’s court in London in 1638, where her father had served as royal painter since 1626. Orazio had established himself as London’s sole Italian painter and one of the first to introduce Caravaggio’s style to the country. Despite the fact that Orazio and Artemisia had not seen one other in over 17 years, there is little evidence of their reunion.

Artemisia produced some of her most renowned works while in London, including her Self-Portrait as an Allegory of Painting (1638). It’s also been reported that she collaborated with her father on an allegorical fresco for Charles I’s wife, Queen Henrietta Maria, at her Greenwich home. Orazio died in 1639 at the age of 75, thus Artemisia’s aid may have been required to complete this important job, especially because Orazio would have been an elderly man.

Artemisia appears to have stayed in London for a few years following her father’s death, though she had clearly departed England by 1642, when the Civil War started out. Her following activities are unknown, although communication with her sponsor, Don Antonio Ruffo, implies she returned to Naples. The final surviving letter between the two dates from 1650, implying that she was still working at the time. Her death date is unknown; there is evidence that she was still working in Naples in 1654, and it has been suggested that she died as a result of the 1656 epidemic that ravaged the city.

The legacy of Artemisia Gentileschi has been contentious and complicated. Despite being well-respected and well-known during her lifetime, she was virtually completely ignored by art historians following her death. This is partially due to the fact that her style was often mistaken for Orazio’s, and many of her works were misattributed to him.

Roberto Longhi, a Caravaggio expert, championed Artemisia’s work when it was rediscovered in the early 1900s. Exaggerated and excessively sexualized interpretations coloured both scholarly and popular descriptions of her life and work.

Famous Art by Artemisia Gentileschi

Susanna and the Elders

1610

This excellent picture, produced when Artemisia Gentileschi was 17 years old, is the earliest known piece fully painted by her. The piece depicts a well-known biblical scenario in which two voyeuristic elders spy on the chaste Susanna while she is bathing, then try to blackmail her into having sexual intercourse with them by falsely accusing her of adultery. Susanna is generally depicted as ignorant of the elders’ presence, or even inviting them in a flirty manner, despite the fact that numerous painters have selected this topic. Susanna’s anxiety at being seen and harassed by the men, on the other hand, is depicted by Gentileschi, who portrays the occurrence as a painful experience.

Judith Slaying Holofernes

1620

Gentileschi shows the murder of Holofernes by Judith, a classic biblical scene (to which she herself returned several times during her career). Judith’s beauty and bravery have always been emphasised in depictions, rather than the beheading act itself. Caravaggio, on the other hand, painted the scene in 1598 with an unsurpassed level of realism. Gentileschi took psychological and physical realism a step further by contemplating the women’s identities as well as the enormous physical difficulties of beheading someone. Gentileschi offers a portrayal of women’s strength in this painting, while also emphasising her own authority as an artist, able to pick her own subjects and make her own judgments about how to approach them. “In most paintings, including Caravaggio’s hallucinatory rendering, Judith has a servant who waits to collect the severed head,” writes Jonathan Jones of The Guardian. Gentileschi, on the other hand, transforms the servant into a powerful young lady who actively participates in the murder. This accomplishes two goals. It adds a level of brutal reality that even Caravaggio could not have imagined: killing this beast would require two women. However, it also lends the scene a revolutionary feel.

Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting

1639

Artemisia Gentileschi provides an allegory of painting using her own self-portrait as the subject in this bold later piece. Gentileschi had a unique chance as a professional woman artist to portray herself as a woman in allegorical settings since painting was historically presented as a woman in allegorical situations. She does this by painting a realistic picture of a painter at work, using fast and fluid brushstrokes to represent the instruments of her profession, such as the palette and brushes. The brown backdrop is sometimes misinterpreted as a blank canvas on which she is painting, indicating her continuous and incomplete artistic effort.

BULLET POINTED (SUMMARISED)

Best for Students and a Huge Time Saver

Artemisia Gentileschi was among the first and only female artists to attain success in the seventeenth century, centuries ahead of her time.
Her Baroque paintings were some of the most dramatic and energetic of her generation, and she became recognised for her realism, skillful use of chiaroscuro, and placing women and their tales at the centre of all her works, following in the footsteps of Caravaggio.
Her surviving works offer a distinct personal viewpoint on the cultural and societal conventions of the time, norms that she frequently subverted by utilising her position as an artist to remark on society’s male-dominated character and to place an alternate accent on female autonomy.

Although Artemisia Gentileschi’s paintings are aesthetically similar to those of Caravaggio and her father Orazio, her paintings lay a greater focus on reality than those of her forefathers.
Her compositions are also more dynamic, and she has fine-tuned her use of texture and colour over her career, becoming recognised for her rich jewel tones and realistic skin tones.
Gentileschi challenged standard portrayals of biblical and mythical female heroes by portraying them as self-motivated heroines capable of making their own choices rather than passive objects of male gaze.

She did so by presenting them in a whole new light, allowing them to wield a power that had previously been denied to them by other artists.
The artist’s juvenile sexual assault experience influenced much of her work, and themes of authority abuse, rape, and violence can be found in many of her paintings.
Painting these images was most likely a way for her to absorb the anguish of her attack and seek retribution and restitution via her art.